A year ago the sector was counting down. Webinars, readiness checklists, gap analyses, and a general sense that 1 November 2025 was a cliff edge. Twelve months on, the more useful question is not whether providers survived the transition. Most did. It is which of the changes turned out to matter, and which ones were noise.

The Aged Care Act 2024 commenced on 1 November 2025, replacing the Aged Care Act 1997 and the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Act 2018. It arrived alongside the Aged Care Rules 2025, the seven strengthened Quality Standards, and Support at Home.

On 3 November 2026, the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing published its own twelve month update, noting that implementation is continuing and identifying areas where more work is needed. That is a fair summary. Here is ours, written from what we have seen inside facilities over the year.

The headlines were real. They were not the change.

The coverage last November focused on three things: a rights-based Act with a legally enforceable Statement of Rights, Support at Home replacing Home Care Packages and Short-Term Restorative Care, and the new residential fee arrangements including RAD retention of up to 2% a year for up to five years.

All three were genuine. All three were also, for most residential providers, largely absorbed within the first quarter. Policies were updated. Agreements were varied. Finance teams rebuilt their models.

The changes that have actually reshaped how providers operate were quieter, and they are still unfolding.

Four things that genuinely changed

1. The audit stopped being an event and became a cycle. Aged care homes are being assessed against the strengthened Quality Standards over a three year period, and My Aged Care continues to display results against the previous Standards until a home has been assessed under the new ones. In practice this means most providers spent the year not knowing precisely when their turn would come. Preparation that assumes a known date no longer works.
2. Registration became the lever. Under the new Act every provider of government-funded aged care must be registered, and the Commission conducts audits when a provider applies to register, renew or vary registration in categories 4, 5 and 6. Audit findings now feed registration decisions. That moves quality from a reputational matter to a licence to operate matter.
3. Accountability acquired a name. The Act introduced a statutory duty on registered providers, and a separate duty on responsible persons, which includes members of a provider's governing body, to exercise due diligence. A responsible person can be liable whether or not the provider itself has been found liable, with civil penalties attached. Boards noticed this one slowly, then all at once.
4. The bar moved from having a policy to showing the practice. The Commission's guidance on the strengthened Standards consistently emphasises how systems and processes work in practice rather than what documents exist. Under the new audit process it grades outcomes as conforming, minor non-conformance or major non-conformance, with its response scaled to the risk to older people.

Where providers have struggled

The Commission's own Quality Bulletins give a reasonably clear picture of where attention has gone during the year.

Pricing transparency has been one of the most common compliance issues identified through the prudential review program, with providers required to publish pricing and service information. The Commission also ran targeted reviews, including one on the Liquidity Standard, specifically to understand whether providers grasp their obligations rather than simply to catch them out.

That last point is worth sitting with. Much of the regulator's year one activity has been educative in character. New audit processes include announced visits and clear communication about concerns and potential non-conformance before findings are made.

Year one was the grace period in temperament, if not in law. It would be unwise to assume year two carries the same tone.

What the strongest operators did differently

Across the facilities we work in, the providers who have had the easiest twelve months were not the ones with the biggest compliance teams. They were the ones who made a handful of structural decisions early.

Two more things we would add, because they came up repeatedly.

• They treated the three year assessment runway as time to build, not time to wait. The providers who deferred are now building under pressure.
• They stopped separating "compliance systems" from "operational systems". The evidence that satisfies an assessor is the same evidence that runs the building well, and maintaining two parallel sets of records was always going to fail.

Where this touches the building itself

Most year in review pieces stop at governance and clinical care. We spend our time in the parts of a facility that rarely make the agenda, so here is what we have seen change there.

Standard 4, The Environment, and Standard 5, Clinical Care, both now require evidence about conditions over time rather than on the day. Nurse call performance, response times, environmental comfort and system reliability have moved from being maintenance concerns to being evidence sources. A provider who can produce twelve months of continuous records about how its building actually performed is in a materially different position to one assembling a folder the week before.

What the next twelve months probably looks like

We would be cautious about predictions, and the Department itself describes implementation as continuing. But three things seem reasonably safe to expect.

More providers will move through their first assessment under the strengthened Standards, which means the sector will finally get a realistic picture of where the bar actually sits. Second, the educative tone of year one will narrow as the Commission accumulates a baseline. Third, governing bodies will keep asking harder questions, because the responsible person duty gives them a personal reason to.

None of that requires a dramatic response. It requires that when somebody asks what happened in your facility last March, the answer exists before the question does.

Frequently asked questions

#AgedCare #AgedCareAct #QualityStandards #AgedCareCompliance #Governance #RTMCloud